Montgomery Journal Letters To The Editor
Lawmakers killed good gun bills along with bad
Your article, ``Senate committee kills gun bills," noted that the
committee ``made quick work" of all gun bills.
Before the hearing started, Chairman Walter Baker announced he was
going to kill all gun bills, regardless of anyone's testimony. I've heard
that Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., D-Calvert, ordered Baker,
D-Cecil, not to let any gun bill out of committee because gun control would
be a losing issue for Democrats this fall.
Fortunately, most of these bills died, especially Sen. Christopher Van
Hollen Jr.'s despicable ``Gun Accountability Act," which would have forced
gun owners to be fingerprinted like common criminals.
Van Hollen, D-Kensington, made a cameo appearance to pitch his ``Gun
Owner Humiliation Act," but he was too busy to stay and hear prepared
testimony from disgruntled constituents like me. Other priorities,
including his quest for Connie Morella's seat, must be keeping him from his
duties in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Unfortunately, two of those bills were good ones. The first, SB 382,
would have allowed any lawful citizen, after passing a safety test and a
background check, to carry a concealed firearm. Contrary to uninformed
opinion, in the 33 states that have such a law already, there are no
shootouts over parking spaces or any such nonsense.
Permit-holders statistically are more law-abiding than the police who
issue them. And guess what? Crime rates go down and lives are saved.
The second bill, SB 469, would have prevented the denial of gun rights
from decent citizens. The National Rifle Association has been warning us
for years about the dreaded ``knock on the door" to confiscate our firearms.
Sadly enough, it already has begun in Maryland. Attorney General Joseph
J. Curran just started enforcing an obscure law that allows him to exploit
misdemeanors to deny gun rights retroactively and confiscate firearms.
In one case, Larry Dickens, from outside Cumberland, had his legally
owned hunting rifle confiscated because of a 20-year-old ``shoving
match."Maryland's Legislature needs to pass some real common-sense gun laws
like these and stop harassing decent gun owners.
STEVE DIRLIK
Silver Spring
Nazi comparisons are not uncommon
Your editorial on campaign finance reform (``Slime creep," March 21)
refers to ``the blitzkrieg ad wars, conducted mostly on television, that
demolish the reputations of candidates." Is there any difference in your
use of the term ``blitzkrieg," which was a particular Nazi military
strategy, and Gus Alzona's controversial flier's emphasis of another
strategy - gun owner registration - used by the Nazis? The ridiculous
characterization of the flier as ``hate speech" trivializes the proposed
trampling of our right to bear arms.
The proposed retaliations by our public officials against the flier's
author tend to reinforce the flier's message. The Journal reports that the
county executive has concluded that the flier is sufficient to have the
author removed from appointed position ``for cause." If I were an editorial
cartoonist, I'd consider a cartoon showing Nazi book burners next to
Montgomery County flier burners.
GEORGE SCHULIN
Derwood
Latham to run as Independent
Independent candidate John Latham said he will run for a House of
Delegates seat in District 16. Nancy Kopp, of Bethesda, vacated a seat in
the district earlier this year to become Maryland's treasurer.
Del. Susan C. Lee, D-Bethesda, was elected Kopp's replacement by local
Democrats and has said she plans to run for the seat this fall.
Latham, a 32-year-old North Bethesda resident, said he supports having
no limits on civilian ownership of weapons, as well as the legalization of
some drugs.
He also said he does not support new or higher taxes, as well as
opposes abortion. In addition, Latham supports Metro growth, but opposes
the Inter-County Connector and other forms of rapid development.
WHITNEY L. JACKSON
This Information Is From MCSM And The Montgomery County Journal
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message
is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|