Conspiracy Lawsuit Filed Against Government Officials
SPECIAL TO: ALL MEDIA
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, April 26, 2000
Contact: Bob Delfay or Doug Painter
(703) 299-9470 or (203) 426-1320
Industry Group and Seven Police Firearms Manufacturers Sue Government
Officials--Conspiracy Alleged
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The National Shooting Sports Foundation and seven police
firearms companies today filed suit in federal court against Secretary of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and mayors
and other officials of 14 municipalities, charging them with an illegal
conspiracy in restraint of trade and in violation of the Commerce Clause of
the United States Constitution.
"The lawsuit arises from a politically-motivated scheme in which these
bureaucrats have sought to bully law enforcement professionals into buying
handguns based not on the quality or safety of the product, but on
capitulation by the manufacturer to a regulatory agenda concocted by these
officials," Robert Delfay, President of the NSSF, stated. "We are here to
expose a plan that brazenly places political self-interest above police and
citizen safety."
"These local officials have tried everything from litigation to economic
extortion to compel compliance on a national level with their own individual
ideas about gun design, ownership and distribution," Delfay said. "That is
wrong by any measure of law, ethics or fairness. Our democratic process is
being perverted, the power vested in our elected leaders is being ignored
and the Constitution is being trampled upon by HUD Secretary Cuomo and other
defendants who have formed an improper alliance with a band of lawyers to
sue us into submission."
The suit by NSSF and the firearms manufacturers asks a federal court in
Atlanta, site of many of the actions undertaken in furtherance of the
conspiracy, to:
... Acknowledge that Secretary Cuomo's efforts and that of other defendants to
impose rules and regulations regarding the design and distribution of
firearms exceed the limits of authority granted to their offices by Congress
and by the U.S. Constitution;
... Prevent Cuomo and other defendants from further steps that violate the
Firearms Owners' Protection Act of 1986;
... Find that the preferential purchase scheme imposed by the defendants
violates the Commerce Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution; and
... Prevent state and local officials from taking actions that restrict
interstate trade or foreign commerce.
"An anti-gun agenda does not excuse anti-democratic behavior," Delfay
stated. "The people of the United States have placed the authority to
regulate firearm design and distribution in the hands of Congress, not in
the hands of a small contingent of self-chosen politicians and their
attorneys."
Delfay also distributed letters from the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) and
the Law Enforcement Alliance of America (LEAA) rejecting the
Administration's plan. "The top concern of any law enforcement agency
handling purchasing firearms is officer safety, not adherence to a
particular political philosophy," stated the FOP. "Law enforcement officers
should not be used as political pawns," wrote LEAA.
"This is not about locks on guns or even gun safety. This is about Eliot
Spitzer telling a homeowner in Iowa what gun he or she can buy, from whom
and how," Delfay said.
NSSF is the voice of the firearms industry with over 1,800 members who are
involved in all aspects of the shooting sports. The firearms companies
involved in the suits are Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Browning Arms, Inc., Colt's
Manufacturing, Inc., Glock, Inc., SIG Arms, Inc., Sturm, Ruger & Company,
Inc., and Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message
is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|